Vinaora Nivo Slider 3.xVinaora Nivo Slider 3.xVinaora Nivo Slider 3.x
Vinaora Nivo Slider 3.xVinaora Nivo Slider 3.xVinaora Nivo Slider 3.x

De Weever questions sewage overflow cause, demands link between nature protection and wastewater enforcement.

ludmilladeweever20102026PHILIPSBURG:---  Member of Parliament Ludmilla de Weever called on Minister of VROMI Patrice Gumbs to clarify whether the wastewater overflow shown in a circulating video resulted from the expiry of a management contract or from an operational problem that could have occurred under any management arrangement.

Speaking during Parliament’s discussion on waste, wastewater and related developments, De Weever said that distinction was essential to explaining the incident to the public.

She asked whether the overflow was linked to the end of the previous contract and the management transition, or to routine operational difficulties.

Her questions followed Gumbs’ earlier statement that the previous wastewater treatment plant management agreement ended in August 2026 and was not renewed. The ministry is carrying out daily operations while preparations for a new management tender continue.

De Weever also challenged the government to explain how the enforcement measures discussed under the Nature Policy Plan would address wastewater entering roads, drains, ponds and other waterways.

She argued that nature protection must connect directly with the sewage problems affecting residential and commercial areas.

To illustrate the concern, De Weever recounted residents' complaints about wastewater runoff from a business in their neighborhood. She said the operator had sought to justify the discharge by alleging that another institution also released water into a pond.

The account was presented as an example of the responses residents encounter when raising complaints. It did not establish the allegation against that institution as fact.

De Weever asked how the government would ensure households, apartment buildings, hotels, and businesses face meaningful consequences for improper wastewater disposal.

She highlighted the environmental and public health implications, noting that pollution entering ponds can ultimately reach the sea.

For an island dependent on tourism, she argued, damage to waterways and coastal waters also threatens the natural assets supporting livelihoods.

“We have to be real with what we’re doing to destroy the things that are making us actually have money,” she said.

De Weever linked those concerns to the island’s increasing building density, questioning whether sewage infrastructure and development requirements adequately accommodate taller buildings.

She asked what conditions apply to a development containing, for example, 60 apartments: whether it must provide its own wastewater facilities, connect to the public sewage network, or meet other requirements.

Her intervention reinforced earlier questions from MPs Veronica Jansen-Webster and Ardwell Irion about how government distinguishes residential apartment properties from commercial premises when determining waste collection responsibilities.

De Weever said Sint Maarten’s limited land area has produced a mix of residential, commercial, and industrial activity, making clear rules and adequate infrastructure especially important.

She also requested an update on previous discussions about financing waste management through a collection fee linked to utility bills.

However, De Weever explicitly stated that she was not calling for an additional charge on GEBE bills, given the high utility costs residents already face.

She cited arrangements elsewhere in the Dutch Caribbean as background to her question, asking what happened to earlier discussions in Sint Maarten and whether the proposal remained under consideration.

“I am not asking to add on additional fees,” she emphasized.

De Weever said she wanted an explanation of the proposal’s status, not to have her request portrayed as support for imposing a new charge.

Another focus was the discharge of pond water into Great Bay following rainfall.

De Weever described occasions when an excavator opens the drainage channel, and the bay then turns brown for several days, depending on sea and weather conditions.

She asked whether future development at the former Great Bay Hotel site could create an opportunity for a public-private partnership to treat water before discharge.

Her question asked whether the government was discussing treatment, cleaning, or reuse of the water as part of planning for the area.

She argued that the issue affects both beach users and any future tourism development beside the discharge point.

De Weever’s contribution brought together four central demands: an explanation of the treatment plant overflow, effective enforcement against wastewater pollution, clarity on waste management financing discussions, and infrastructure requirements capable of supporting further development.

The supplied proceedings did not include the minister’s responses to her questions.


Ottley to Gumbs: Ask for help on waste crisis or vacate the seat.

omarottley20102026PHILIPSBURG:--- Member of Parliament Omar Ottley delivered a sharp warning to Minister of VROMI Patrice Gumbs during Parliament’s discussion on waste and wastewater management, urging him to accept assistance in addressing sanitation problems and declaring that pride should never stand in the way of solutions.

Ottley offered to help develop policy changes to improve garbage collection and wastewater enforcement. However, he questioned whether government would give proposals meaningful attention.

“If you cannot figure it out, then ask for the help,” Ottley said. “And if you are too proud to ask for the help, and your pride won’t allow you, then it’s time to vacate the seat.”

He urged Gumbs to seek assistance before reaching that point, saying he refused to believe the minister had taken office without the country’s interests at heart.

Ottley’s intervention followed questions from other MPs about wastewater treatment plant operations, uncollected garbage, apartment collection rules and enforcement against pollution.

He criticized what he described as the minister’s dismissive response to concerns about circulating videos, asking whether Gumbs acknowledged the extent of the problems.

Earlier in the meeting, Gumbs said the request for the discussion had not made sufficiently clear which information had reached the requesting MPs. He nevertheless updated the committee on waste collection tenders and the ministry’s management of the wastewater treatment plant.

Ottley argued that the visible conditions demanded a more direct response.

“The country is suffering,” he said. “The place looks deplorable.”

He specifically cited videos from Simpson Bay and Kim Sha, describing the conditions shown as “atrocious.” He also raised concerns about garbage in Cay Bay and Cole Bay.

According to Ottley, private citizens and patrons had stepped in to remove garbage from one affected area. He questioned why collection responsibilities remained unresolved while waste accumulated.

His remarks addressed the distinction between commercial and residential waste, an issue MPs Veronica Jansen-Webster and Ardwell Irion raised earlier.

Ottley said some locations had customarily received collection from previous haulers. He suggested a replacement contractor might now decline to collect waste considered commercial because that service falls outside the work it is paid for.

He acknowledged that a hauler could be acting within its contractual rights, but insisted that government still had to resolve the resulting sanitation problem.

“But then where does the buck stop?” he asked.

Ottley called for waste planning to account for tourism-driven demands alongside residents'. He argued that visitor activity adds substantially to the volume of garbage requiring collection and disposal.

On wastewater, Ottley asked whether an interministerial task force he established while Minister of VSA remained operational.

He said the initiative involved VSA, VROMI and Justice, with discussions also involving the National Recovery Program Bureau. According to Ottley, the work included efforts to establish mechanisms to issue and collect fines.

“Is that task force still operational?” he asked, requesting confirmation that the ministries were still communicating about wastewater problems.

The question reinforced MP Darryl York's concerns about whether inspector training would translate into effective enforcement and whether changes were needed to enable administrative fines.

Ottley said he was prepared to assist Gumbs with a policy proposal or amendment, but wanted assurance that the work would be considered.

He referred to previous regulatory proposals he said he had submitted to ministers, expressing frustration that initiatives could be left unattended following changes in office.

For Ottley, repeated parliamentary complaints reflected unresolved problems.

“A broken record means that something is wrong,” he said, arguing that MPs would not need to keep returning to the same issues if corrective action had been taken.

He closed by renewing his offer to help develop changes aimed at a cleaner and safer Sint Maarten, while making clear that he considered the current response inadequate.

The supplied exchange did not include Gumbs’ answers to Ottley’s questions or his response to the offer of assistance.

Roseburg questions sewage plant staffing; Meyers calls for visitor contribution to waste management.

roseburgmeyers20102026PHILIPSBURG:---  Member of Parliament Sjamira Roseburg demanded details about the staffing, training and monitoring arrangements at the wastewater treatment plant, while MP Franklin Meyers called for a system through which visitors contribute to the cost of keeping Sint Maarten clean.

Their contributions to Parliament’s discussion on waste and wastewater management raised questions about the ministry’s operational capacity and the financing of tourism-affected services.

Roseburg asked Minister of VROMI Patrice Gumbs how many ministry employees manage and operate the wastewater treatment plant, which departments they come from, and whether their assignments are temporary or permanent.

She also questioned whether transferring personnel to the facility had weakened other government services.

“How is their assignment affecting operations in the departments they came from?” she asked, requesting details of any tasks or services delayed or reduced as a result.

Gumbs had earlier informed Parliament that the ministry was carrying out daily operations after the previous plant management agreement ended in August 2026 and was not renewed.

Roseburg sought clarification on whether the facility is staffed around the clock, including weekends and public holidays. If it is not, she asked who monitors operations outside normal working hours.

She further requested confirmation that the assigned employees possess the training and certification required to operate a wastewater treatment plant.

Her questions also covered compensation, including whether employees receive overtime, shift allowances, or additional payments for hazardous duties or assigned functions.

On enforcement, Roseburg asked Gumbs to identify the legislative assistance he needs from Parliament.

She said outdated laws were part of the problem and asked for a list of measures MPs could help advance as co-legislators.

“Where do you need the help?” she asked.

Roseburg also asked for an update on a motion she said she submitted with MP Sarah Wescot-Williams during the 2026 budget discussions on illegal dumping and fines.

In particular, she sought progress on a dedicated hotline for residents to report violations. While acknowledging that a contact number already exists, she questioned whether a more specific complaints hotline could be established and whether compensation for people making reports had been considered.

Following earlier remarks by MP Ludmilla de Weever, Roseburg also asked whether the government had examined waste-collection financing arrangements elsewhere in the Dutch Caribbean.

She emphasized that her question aimed to establish the status of that discussion, not to call for additional charges on residents’ current bills.

Meyers, meanwhile, pressed Gumbs to establish the cause of the wastewater overflow shown in a circulating video.

He asked whether it resulted from an operational problem, such as a blockage, or whether it was connected to the end of the previous management contract and an interruption in maintenance.

Meyers also wanted to know whether similar incidents had occurred before.

He argued that Parliament needed to distinguish between a problem that can arise during normal operations and an overflow caused by inadequate upkeep.

His questions echoed De Weever’s earlier request for a clear explanation of whether the incident was linked to the management transition.

Turning to garbage collection, Meyers argued that the government’s financing arrangements must account for the waste generated by visitors alongside that produced by residents.

He suggested that a collection contract sufficient for the resident population could still face pressure from additional tourism demands.

Meyers called on the government to determine how visitors could contribute to the island's cleanliness, including the costs of garbage collection and the landfill.

“We are going to have to figure out a way for them to contribute to the cleanliness of the island also,” he said.

While recognizing tourism as the country’s main source of income, Meyers argued that visitor activity also strains infrastructure and the environment.

He did not outline a specific fee, collection mechanism, or proposed amount during his contribution.

The supplied transcript ends with the MPs’ speaking round. It did not include Gumbs’ responses to Roseburg’s staffing questions or Meyers’ proposals on visitor contributions.

The Christmas House in Cripple Gate launches a €10,000 fundraising campaign to light up Christmas 2026.

For more than 45 years, the Christmas House, also known as the Maison du Père Noël, has been bringing the magic of Christmas to Cripple Gate, Saint-Martin. To prepare for the 2026 edition, its organizers are launching an online fundraising campaign on GoFundMe, aiming to raise €10,000.

xmashouse21102026MARIGOT:--- Every year, as the festive season approaches, the house in Cripple Gate lights up and welcomes young and old from across the island. Its decorations, lights, and displays make it one of Saint-Martin's most anticipated Christmas events. This family tradition has lasted more than 45 years thanks to the passion and volunteer work of the people who keep it alive.

To make the 2026 edition even more beautiful, the team needs support. The funds raised will renew the decorations and lights, buy materials, create a new installation, and cover the costs of opening and welcoming visitors. Preparations have already begun, so the campaign is launching now.

The association Good Friends runs the campaign, which will remain open until 15 December. Everyone can take part, whatever the amount, at gofund.me/43ba6cbbb. Sharing the campaign around you is another way to help.

We'll unveil the theme of the 2026 edition in the coming weeks. The house opens to the public on 6 December 2026.

“For more than 45 years, this house has belonged a little to all of Saint-Martin. Every Christmas, we see children filled with wonder, and parents who came here themselves when they were small. With this support, we want to keep writing this beautiful Christmas story with everyone.”

says Monique Joe, President of the association Good Friends.

How to support the Christmas House

  • Make a donation at gofund.me/43ba6cbbb
  • Share the campaign with your network and on social media
  • Follow the preparations on the Christmas House Facebook page: [page link]

About the Christmas House

The Christmas House, or Maison du Père Noël, is a decorated house open to the public every year in Cripple Gate, Saint-Martin, for more than 45 years. It welcomes families, schools, and visitors free of charge to discover its decorations and lights.

Central Committee meeting of Parliament regarding General Audit Chamber’s Annual Report 2025 .

PHILIPSBURG:--- The House of Parliament will sit in a Central Committee meeting on October 22, 2026.  

The Central Committee meeting is scheduled for Thursday at 10.00 hrs. in the House's General Assembly Chamber at Wilhelminastraat #1 in Philipsburg. Representatives of the General Audit Chamber will attend.

The agenda point is:

Presentation Annual Report 2025 – General Audit Chamber

Members of the public are invited to the House of Parliament to attend parliamentary deliberations. All persons visiting the House of Parliament must adhere to the house rules.

The House of Parliament is located across from the Court House in Philipsburg. 

The parliamentary sessions will be carried live on TV 15, Soualiga Headlines, via SXM GOV radio FM 107.9, via Pearl Radio FM 98.1, the audio via the internet www.sxmparliament.org, www.youtube.com/c/SintMaartenParliament and www.pearlfmradio.sx


Subcategories

Vinaora Nivo Slider 3.x
Vinaora Nivo Slider 3.xVinaora Nivo Slider 3.x
Vinaora Nivo Slider 3.x
Vinaora Nivo Slider 3.x
Vinaora Nivo Slider 3.x
Vinaora Nivo Slider 3.x