Vinaora Nivo Slider 3.xVinaora Nivo Slider 3.xVinaora Nivo Slider 3.x
Vinaora Nivo Slider 3.xVinaora Nivo Slider 3.x

Severe conflict of interest within the board of directors of the SMMC hampers improvement in quality of care; Inspectorate imposes new demand against SMMC, under penalty of forfeiture of fines in case of non-compliance.

The continued failure by SMMC to not adhere to the legal demands by the Inspectorate to take actions that will remedy the current deficiencies in rendering a basic quality of care within the hospital has regretfully resulted in a decision by the Inspectorate to impose another demand against SMMC, under the penalty of forfeiture of significant fines in case of non-compliance within set deadlines. SMMC must now also procure that within a period of 14 days and thus on or before November 28th, 2012, either the service agreement with AnG Consulting N.V. is terminated or (alternatively) Dr. G.A. Scot resigns as a member of the Board of Directors of SMMC.
SMMC maintains its position that the Inspectorate is not authorized to supervise the governance process in the SMMC. Articles 15, 16, 17 and 30 of the National Ordinance on Health Care Institutions however stipulate clear regulations for governance, management and quality monitoring in these institutions. Articles 23, 24 and 30 of the same Ordinance also state that the Inspectorate is the body authorized to enforce those regulations.
Unlike in the old days when the Supervisory Board only supervised the financial status of the hospital, nowadays the Supervisory Boards are also responsible for the internal supervision of the quality of care provided by hospitals. It is the Supervisory Board's responsibility to act when the Board of Directors dysfunctions, in providing quality care. In the rest of the world, e.g. in Holland it is quite common nowadays for external supervisory bodies, like the Inspectorates of Health to audit a hospital on health governance matters. Since 2010 the Dutch Association of Hospitals has developed a governance code for all its members to explain this new policy. SMMC however refuses to subject itself to this external supervision on governance matters by the Inspectorate. While the hospital is still under intensified supervision, the Inspectorate discovered the existence of a contract signed on September 17th, 2008, between AnG Consulting N.V. and SMMC, for supplying services to the hospital i.c. the daily board of directors / CEO for the hospital during the next 5 years.
AnG Consulting N.V. is established at the home address of Dr. G. Scot who appears to also be one of the owners of AnG Consulting N.V. and in any case the CEO of this company. The contract was signed by Dr. G. Scot on behalf of AnG consulting N.V. with SMMC as the other contracting party, represented by the chairman of the Supervisory Board of SMMC at that time. Meanwhile, the Director of the Chamber of Commerce on St. Maarten has declared that the service provider AnG Consulting N.V. is not registered in the Registry with the Chamber of Commerce on St. Maarten. Research of the Inspectorate in Curacao, Aruba, the BES Islands and even in the Netherlands shows furthermore that AnG Consulting N.V. is also not registered in any of these other countries. The Department of Tourism, Economy, Transportation and Telecommunication on St. Maarten moreover confirmed to the Inspectorate that no business-license was issued to a company with the corporate name AnG Consulting N.V.
Dr. G.A. Scot is not only the CEO of AnG Consulting N.V., but for all intent and purposes appears to also have a financial stake in this company, that is registered at his home address on St. Maarten and seems to have been incorporated by his wife, Mrs. A. Scot. Effective April 25th, 2008, Dr. G.A. Scot has also been appointed as the only member of the Board of Directors of SMMC and functions as the director of SMMC. Dr. G.A. Scot in reality thus holds two (2) different positions related to SMMC. On the one hand he is the Director of SMMC and on the other hand he is the CEO of the "independent" service provider AnG Consulting N.V., a company wherein again he appears to also have a financial interest.
Article 15 paragraphs 3 of the National Ordinance on Health Care Institutions clearly states that it is prohibited for a.o. members of the Board of Directors of a hospital, to have a stake in any other company that does business with the hospital. The reason behind this law is to prevent abuse in hospitals by persons holding key positions and/or who have decisive power. The quality of care can be seriously hampered if such abuse could materialize within hospitals, as a consequence of conflict of interests. Dr. G.A. Scot is wearing two different hats, one as the director of SMMC and the other one as the CEO or representative of the "independent" service provider AnG Consulting N.V. This is clearly a violation of the Law. This conflict of interest enables abuse by a person/company who is holding a key position within SMMC, with decisive powers. Consequently, financial interests can potentially prevail over conditions to enforce a responsible quality of care.
The Inspectorate establishes that the service agreement between SMMC and ANG Consulting N.V., managed by dr. G.A. Scot:

  1. allows ANG Consulting N.V. (read Dr. G.A. Scot) to also render services to SMMC from abroad;
  2. does not regulate how many hours ANG Consulting N.V.(read Dr. G.A. Scot) must render services to earn a fixed monthly fee;
  3. does not, at least not directly, contain any performance standards and/or norms;
  4. stipulates that the performance of ANG Consulting N.V. will be evaluated by SMMC and thus in principle by the Director of SMMC, namely Dr. G.A. Scot. The service agreement itself does in any case not contain any provision to deal with this obvious conflict of interest;
  5. grants ANG Consulting N.V. the right to a yearly bonus and in case of premature termination a fixed termination compensation, if ANG Consulting N.V. receives a positive evaluation for its performance. Under the terms of the service agreement this evaluation can be performed by -the Director of- SMMC;

Article 5 paragraph 5 of the bylaws of SMMC state that the Board of Directors of SMMC is comprised of one (1) or maximum two (2) natural persons. The "founding fathers" of SMMC clearly intended for only natural persons of flesh and blood and not companies, to be able to manage SMMC. The Inspectorate understands that the reason for this limitation is to at all times ensure clarity and transparency pertaining to the person who actually manages SMMC, the only hospital on St. Maarten. Ang Consulting N.V. can therefore as a company never substitute the natural person who must render the managerial services as per the bylaws of SMMC.
The investigation conducted by the Inspectorate however shows that AnG Consulting N.V. is in essence functioning as the director/manager of SMMC. This constitutes yet another potential violation of the bylaws of SMMC.
Several requests from the Inspectorate to get clarification on these matters from the Board of Directors have been rejected on behalf of Dr. G.A. Scot by the attorney of SMMC. Dr. G.A. Scot has also regretfully refused to attend a meeting called by the Inspectorate to give reason and account, stating simply again that he does not acknowledge any authority of the Inspectorate to exercise external supervision on what he calls Governance Matters.
gscotabsenteeism201114112012Contrary to what SMMC wants to stubbornly believe, the Inspectorate is bound to ensure that the St. Maarten citizens can enjoy proper basic medical services by SMMC, as per internationally accepted standards. Exercising supervision on also the "governance" of SMMC is not only legally codified in the Law, it is the only way to ensure good quality of care for the St. Maarten citizens, who do not have the powers vested unto the Inspectorate, and are as such not able to act against for example the established conflict of interest and other violations by SMMC of its own bylaws. Where the health care professionals on Sint Maarten haven't defined norms a/o standards, the Inspectorate moreover has the authority, not to say the legal obligation, to apply internationally accepted minimum medical standards, in consultation with the field. These internationally accepted norms and/or minimum standards have been applied by the Inspectorate to SMMC. An example hereof is how many professionals must work in the ER Department of SMMC to continuously (24/7) provide efficient and good quality of care, considering the approximately 60.000 citizens residing on St. Maarten.
The Inspectorate has observed that the one and only member of the board of directors, namely Dr. G.A. Scot, is approximately 50-60 % of the time off island on a monthly basis, for the past 2 years and maybe even longer. The data given is from the stay of Dr. G.A. Scot in the Netherlands alone. The Inspectorate has no data of the directors stay elsewhere, e.g. in the USA. The chart hereunder outlines this absenteeism.
Meanwhile very important matters that determine quality of care and patient safety such as: (i) a necessary quality management system in the hospital, (ii) performance and production by the medical specialists, (iii) medical treatment protocols, (iv) conducting period meetings with the Medical Staff and (v) preventive maintenance, haven't gotten the attention they require over the past years.
gscotabsenteeism201214112012The continued lack of proper governance for the past years has led to deficiencies in critical areas, impacting the services provided by the SMMC.
The tremendous understaffing amongst medical specialists for the past years is causing an enormous strain on the performance of those specialists, nurses and other staff members who do their utmost to provide care that complies with internationally accepted standards. Given the conditions under which they have to work they try to prevent that suboptimal care is given.
A enthusiastic majority of the nursing staff has done a good job in keeping the wards and other department's operational, applying proper nursing standards.
The actual presence in SMMC and commitment of these persons stands out in dire contracts to the structural 50-60% on average absenteeism of the one and only member of the Board of Directors, Dr. G.A. Scot.
It is high time for SMMC to instead of continuously fight against the Supervision exercised by the Inspectorate and to that extent having already initiated 4 court cases (2 main and 2 injunction cases) and having its attorneys write countless letters, devote its scarce resources and energy to ensuring that demands of the Inspectorate, the body exercising supervision on behalf of the St. Maarten citizens, to enable good basic quality of medical care are properly and timely met. The sooner SMMC can understand that it is (i) subject to the external supervision by the Inspectorate and (ii) must abide to the imposed demands to improve the level of care, the sooner the quality of care on St. Maarten can be brought to what the St. Maarten citizens can and should within reason expect.
The Inspectorate in closing continues striving to ensure that an adequate level of medical care is rendered to the St. Maarten Community.

Press Release from Inspectorate of Health

Vinaora Nivo Slider 3.xVinaora Nivo Slider 3.x

RADIO FROM VOICEOFTHECARIBBEAN.NET

Vinaora Nivo Slider 3.x
Vinaora Nivo Slider 3.xVinaora Nivo Slider 3.x
Vinaora Nivo Slider 3.x
Vinaora Nivo Slider 3.x
Vinaora Nivo Slider 3.x
Vinaora Nivo Slider 3.x